Polyamorous bisexual personal polyamory pages poly web holtak utja online dating
[Edit 3/2014: I no longer endorse all the statements in this document.I think many of the conclusions are still correct, but especially section 1 is weaker than it should be, and many reactionaries complain I am pigeonholing all of them as agreeing with Michael Anissimov, which they do not; this complaint seems reasonable.
What evidence have the Reactionaries cite for their side?
Although debating the meaning of category words is almost never productive, I feel like in that case I have more than enough excuse.
It is a staple of Reactionary thought that everything is getting gradually worse.
Part of Part 3 will be an attempt to define Progressivism, but for now I’m going to just sweep all of this under the rug and pretend that “Reactionary” and “Progressive” (or for that matter “leftist” and “rightist”) have obvious well-defined meanings that are exactly what you think they are.
The one point where this becomes very important is in the discussion over the word “demotist” in Part 2.